A NEW WEB LOG!

So rarely do I write a log - being so, when it comes time that I do, you know immediately how important it must be, and this is certainly no exception.

I was recently on IMDb, reading about Baz Luhrman's upcoming epic Gone-With-The-Wind lookalike titled Australia. One of the main topics in the forum was titled 'Damned Collagen' in which the poster went on howling from the Hollywood Hills about how he or she was upset at the obvious addiction of botox, specifically with Nicole Kidman - the following individual noting her plastic look as of recent.



Whether or not it is addictive is not of my concern, rather the reasoning behind it. It didn't take much thought to discover the REAL intention behind BOTOX. Botox may have been created by a doctor, but it was, by no doubt in my mind, in collaboration with the Studio Execs of the film industry. By now you're wondering how I came to this conclusion, I'm sure. Well, let's do the math. From it's conception, the most you've heard about botox is from people that piss, shit and eat under the limelight. It wasn't hard for studio executives to stress it's importance to it's agents, and the agent's to their clients, but still, WHY? Well, my children, here is why...

Botox is in fact meant to, over some duration of time, lend a plastic exterior to those who use it regularly (i.e. The Average American Actor)... the aesthetic is not only appealing, but also begins to blur the line between what is real and what is imitation. When the line is blurred beyond comprehension and more Americans begin to notice, businesses like Weta Workshop will have advanced so drastically in terms of technology, that they will be able to replicate the image of actors on screen without the labor of any professionals.

Now, listen up. This revolution is NOT very far off at all. In fact, it's so close you can taste it. Is this an assumption? An estimate? No, merely piecing together the facts. An actors strike is beginning to seem more and more imminent in the coming months and WHEN it comes to be, WHAT do you think will happen!? THAT'S RIGHT! THE DESTRUCTION OF THE FILM ACTOR. NO LONGER WILL ANY OF YOU BE NEEDED IN THE TOWN OF GLITZ AND GLAMOUR. YOU WILL BE REPLACED BY MEN IN TIGHT SUITS WITH LIGHT BULBS ATTACHED TO THEIR BODIES IN SEEMINGLY-RANDOM POINTS.

Hollywood needs to get it's act together. Stop the botox. Start the strike. The sooner all this happens the higher the likelyhood is to keep your career a vibrant and healthy one instead of just looking that way.

Thank you.

R.I.P. Heath Ledger

04.04.79 - 01.22.08

May One of, if not the Best Actor of our Generation Rest in Peace.

This is, no doubt, a sad day for Cinema.

OCD Happens

And for me it's reoccuring around the hour of FOUR.A.M.

It's not so much OCD... It may be a bit more of an idiosyncrasy. Little things tend to bug me. Such as when I'm sifting through the iTunes "Cover Flow" and I'll stop on an album and notice that the album image doesn't fill the iTunes preferences, leaving a white gap on the top, bottom, left side, or sometimes all three. For example the Arcade Fire album, 'Funeral' has a large white border on the top and bottom I don't believe to be native to the tangible copy. And I think about this...

Also, one of my favorite things to do as of late is catch up on an entire tv series via DVD. My friend and I will start watching and after say, the first season, he tends to believe he's become so acquainted with the opening credits and theme song that he fast forwards through them, at times even skipping to the next chapter. I have two problems with this - First, this is likely a tv show others have found solace in and on some episodes if there happens to be the slump, you can COUNT on the opening credits to be the same ones you love and sing or hum along to, or if you have a particular interest in listening to Ron Howard's calming voice preceeding the following 24 minutes of hilarity. Furthermore, skipping a CHAPTER, and entire CHAPTER on the DVD sometimes skips ahead on the storyline. We're talking about essential exposition here (they often only have 24 minutes, your story is probably revealed after the first 30 seconds).

That's my RANT for the NIGHT/MORNING. And don't ask why I capatalize some words - some just feel as though they SHOULD be. DAMNIT.

This post is for people who are wondering what classic TV shows they might have missed at the end of the last millennium and a period from say 2003-2006. Damn the networks. These two cancelled shows are the karma behind the writer strike!

An Exchange Concerning an Ingmar Bergman Quote

"People ask what are my intentions with my films, my aims. It is a difficult and dangerous question, and I usually give an evasive answer: I try to tell the truth about the human condition, the truth as I see it. This answer seems to satisfy everyone, but it is not quite correct. I prefer to describe what I would like my aim to be.

There is an old story of how the cathedral of Chartres was struck by lightning and burned to the ground. Then thousands of people came from all points of the compass, like a giant procession of ants, and together they began to rebuild the cathedral on its old site. They worked until the building was completed — master builders, artists, labourers, clowns, noblemen, priests, burghers. But they all remained anonymous, and no one knows to this day who built the cathedral of Chartres.

Regardless of my own beliefs and my own doubts, which are unimportant in this connection, it is my opinion that art lost its basic creative drive the moment it was separated from worship.

It severed an umbilical cord and now lives its own sterile life, generating and degenerating itself. In former days the artist remained unknown and his work was to the glory of God. He lived and died without being more or less important than other artisans; 'eternal values,' 'immortality' and 'masterpiece' were terms not applicable in his case.

The ability to create was a gift. In such a world flourished invulnerable assurance and natural humility. Today the individual has become the highest form and the greatest bane of artistic creation."
-Ingmar Bergman

My friend and I proceeded to discuss the quote, as follows:

ABRAHAM PALOYA: It looks as though you have 5 separate quotes.

WILLIAM LINDBERG: But I don't!

AP: Very interesting quote.

WL: I don't know how true it is, but if nothing else it makes you think about what you're doing in a different light.

AP: Do you think he's saying that his intention with film is to revert himself as an artist back to one of worship?

WL: Personally, I think he's saying don't be bigger than your art.

AP: Yeah. Ok. I like it. I think Mel Gibson is bigger than his art. (laughter)

WL: YES! Thank you! Hollywood is bigger than its art because it values profit to an extent that dilutes the material.

AP: Yes, that's been true for decades. The billboards that read 'Mel Gibson's Apocalypto' were interesting if only because his name was nearly as big as the title of the film.

WL: I should say studios, because indie films can still be Hollywood. You could argue that the 60's were the change after the New Wave.

AP: The thing that shocked me the most from Death to the Tinman (Sundance Short Film from '07) was that the director's name was at the top of the credits list when it rolled, but his name was the same size as any other person involved in the production.

WL: That's true, but try and find a film that's not marketed with names.

AP: It's tough. Especially the bigger the name. And if your work is bigger than your name, then your past work is used to sell your new work, if that makes any sense. For example: From the Director of So-and-So.

WL: Even simpler than that: Starring... That alone did it in. People went to see I Am Legend for one reason alone: Will Smith was in it. Intentional or not, he is bigger than what he makes a living from.

AP: Yes. I'd say it's somewhat inevitable in that the movie-going public recognize their favorite actors... and if a director finds him or herself compatible with the actor, they simply won't refuse to use another just to keep their art grounded... but I see where youre coming from.

WL: I'm just oversimplifying it.

AP: The funny thing about Will Smith and any other famous actor (Johnny Depp has recently become a GREAT example) is that their celebrity is in no way due to their ego... its the studio's that boast names to this brobdingnagian proportion!

WL: Yes, agreed.

The conversation ended there... but I think we've finally wrapped our heads around the quote of Mr. Bergman. You can decide for yourself if you think the meaning of the quote differs from what we concluded.